We are consumers of facts. Victims of the doctrine of the nerve, which follows the mob spirit of "shoot first ask questions later." DNA is part of our citizens. The shameless abuse has become a small price to pay for peaceful coexistence. A silent pact in which the meek and civil claims get nowhere as long as the perpetrators of evil are rubbing their hands out satisfied with it, or put an innocent face and fuss when they are hunted.
One gets the feeling that being a good citizen does not pay much of the time.
At the end of life are three options: take the knife between his teeth one day every other well, live resigned to turning the other cheek, or play the game and spend suicio from victim to executioner. The first, the figure of righteous social guarantees absolute misery under a permanent regime of anger, the second offers the tranquility of the sheep in his flock refuge and consolation of knowing that most of us are victims at some point, the third is a double-edged sword that can generate short-term satisfaction, but usually accompanied by a good portion of remorse that sooner or later tend to take effect. To be a scoundrel must have stomach, and not everyone has it.
These roles are easily imaginable in any supermarket queue. Some people go ahead of the pack, armed with decision, with head high, conveying an aura of reason and willing to avoid the tedious wait. If nobody says anything, mission accomplished. A classic in it a fait accompli. Usually, many who are keeping the order look away to avoid the violent situation in silence and wonder if that person was before, if the dependent family or if it was his right because "as no one says anything." If any of these are usually incites do solo, shy with some support from the rest who think that this is not their war, and usually conclude with the recoiling cheek, if not to the point that would correspond. In short: which is usually take advantage of others to cash in and improve their situation.
If we translate the small altercations daily on a global scale, although the players change, the roles are maintained and the results too.
A variable increases, the strategy of fait accompli is often linked to those with more power, those who put the laws so that they comply with others.
A textbook example is the Russian plan to invade Georgia or close the gas tap to Ukraine, leaving half frozen Europe. With apologies somewhat cryptic, the government rocked by Putin made good the "shoot first and ask questions later." He did not like what happened in the former Soviet republic and came with tanks while the international community looked the other way or had a complaint with the book claims the United Nations. That is, as they say in my land, how to claim the "gunsmith". Nothing at all. Now Europeans decided to cool tempers as a starting point to negotiate an agreement on gas prices. A smart move to get away with its objective, but outside any rules of good neighborly. Again, won the accomplished facts.
Along the same lines serving Israel, ready to reclaim Palestinian blood to recover from terrorist attacks by Hamas. Not solve the problem in the Middle East, but at least calm your craving for revenge. It is absurd to expect international retaliation. The Israeli attack will end when they see fit. Then will come the peace agreements, which will break again when purchased. By the same token, I can think of that would force Palestinians to organize and cross all the same day at the same time ISRALIES borders. A Green March Moroccan style in Western Sahara transported to the Gaza Strip. Not enough to stop bullets like display progress. Nor would end the conflict, but annoy.
Another expert is fait accompli that U.S. attacked Iraq for its own risk and that opened the Guantanamo prison to avoid its own legal system, to name a few. The nuclear policies of Iran and North Korea follow the same principle: "I do and then we'll see." The list of these players is endless.
In all cases, these countries would act with the profile of the abuser, the doctrine applies to fait accompli. An alternative role to that of looking the other way when interested. The role of protest that is often placed on small and weak nations, who still believe that the UN is an organization that deserves trust, and also the European Union.
The Community institution papelos buried lives, ministerial meetings, bilateral meetings, summits and recumbres, often stormy, which serve to increase the bureaucracy, make a couple of photos, talk about human rights, pat on the back and projecting forward to the goodness of international actors. It is not naive, but a lack of internal arrangements to have a common vision that enables them to become abusers, as the rest.
The EU has rarely been effective in apaclar the souls of the miscreants, who, like in line at the supermarket, often stand to gain something even when it seems lost. Remorse absent.
Photo from stock.xchng
# 1 by Maggot on 03/03/2009 - 15:49
BEM Interessante